A huge amount of money aimed at stopping AI legislation is already set to reset US Electolic Politics in the next cycle, and now a huge amount of money to get Spurling is going to cancel it. None of this is business as usual, and it will be dangerous.
According to the New York Times, the Brand New 501 (C) (C) (4) Group is just born facing the money of the Pro-ai Pac with the money of the Anti-AI Pac, and the plan, according to 50 million. This organization calls itself community first, and it will begin to flood in money from donors not from the Democratic Anti-Ai Super Pac called DEPS and Democracy PAC, and the Republican Twin called our HAC.
A person who seems to be involved in society first, according to Billionaire Anthropic Co-Founder jack clark, Billionaire eBay Founder Pierre Edyar, and Billionaire Facebook Counderer Dustin Moskovitz.
A “Pac” or “” Political Committee raises legally limited donations to influence election results. A Super Pac is an independent PAC that is allowed to raise unlimited amounts of money because it is not directly involved with campaigns. So Super PACs are known to run negative ads posted by anti-voters, which don’t need to work together to benefit friendly people.
According to the New York Times, who learned about these new PACs from unknown sources, all this is not such a thing – a secret answer to the Pro-ai Pac that leads the future. Leading the future, which had $ 100 million written down when the news of its existence passed earlier this month, is supported by Breg Coonder, and Horowitz’s Marc Andreessen, and Joe Lonsdale the founder of PalAntir. The leading objective for the future is to bring back candidates who oppose the regulation of AI.
The amounts of money these groups are throwing around are intense, and way beyond normal spending levels for businesses and “special interests” in the US For reference, the United Auto Worker’s PAC, which is considered quite influential, raised $15,259,386 for the 2024 election cycle according to OpenSecrets. The oil and gas industry, meanwhile, gave $13,895,000 to PAS PACs that same cycle, according to Sludge.
The kind of economic power these AI PACs reach (or hope to find) on the scale of the Presidential Super Pac, secured in August of August, according to the New York Times. Crypto’s Fairshake Super PAC similarly has $140 million, putting aside AI, the reshaping of politics for the strange technological age.
For an example of what AI PAC money looks like, look at its hostility earlier this month to New York Asseblomber Alex Bores, who is running for a house seat. Bores is a major sponsor of a piece of New York legislation that requires AI companies to work to prevent “serious harm” from AI models, but he found himself and his team and team in the crosshairs of thousands of people in California. Leading the future vowed to spend millions keeping this random person out of the conference.
The Bores told the San Francisco Examiner that they are under fire “in a part of Silicon Valley that is very difficult [viewpoint] That there shouldn’t be any regulation of Ayi or anything, “and noted that” the fact that they are direct about it is something I am grateful for. ” In politics, boreres are popular now.
This type of Weirveness will accelerate. Among the groups that the times say help to dream in society first are “co-donors who are tied to the active movement of altruism.”
Effective altruism is not on the political map. An EA is a set method of spending money, which aims to accumulate a very large amount of money, then turn it around and use it to try to reduce possible temptations. The list of prominent members will include imprisoned crypto King Sam Bankman-Fried, as well as highly unlikely philosophers such as Peter Singer and Nick BOSTROM.
These groups, in short, are not psychological. The pro-ai side, which has led the future, has so far only seemed to upset the Trump administration, although the Republican party is more vulnerable to its agenda. At that time, the public first, and its democratic and integrated democratic fishes will support that they will support candidates with opposing agendas before long.
Many will find the lack of a clear part to be a relief, but rather than a bipartan dream, the two politically ambiguous titans will do things personally, and – alongside crypto – will try and even go as far as to cross the entire political universe in the next year.
Elections in the US are always painful. What’s to come could be worse. I can’t wait.
