Will the latest Basquiait go down in history? Al Diaz has his doubts

Three or four years ago, Director Julius Onah was posted on social media that he was making a movie called Samo is alive. Al Diaz saw it and thought, here we go again. “It’s called Samo is alive. Do you understand what you are saying? ” It was asked. “Samo was not his nickname. Samo was more than just a phrase for ‘the same old shit.’ Samo was the ultimate inside joke. Let’s get that really understandable. “
Diaz, now 66, is one part of the most influential partnership in the history of New York City – the history of graffiti that became the latestpad of Jean-Michel Basquiat to Art World Stardom. Without Samo, it is possible that there would be no core as we know it. And without al y-alz, there would be no samo.
As a recording of Samo is alive It was close to completion, Diaz spoke to the observer at length about basquaiat, samo and Hollywood. Sitting on a bench in the middle of his recent arttown art exhibition at the Van der Plas Gallery, Lower East Side Plall Gallery, Diaz reflected as he observed how Hollywood writes, or rewrites, history. He said that when Anah and Actor Danny Ramirez (who play Diaz in the movie) met him, they did not tell him that he and Samo would not be featured.
In September, Samo is alive It was the movies in Tompkins Square Park, just blocks from the public housing complex where Diaz grew up. As the cameras roll on the scene with Kelvin Harrison Jr. like REQuait and Antony Starr like Andy Warhol, Diaz appeared to take a certain measure of the project. “They said this was going to be a Basquiat origin or something. A BASQuall origin? I don’t think so.
The production wrapped in October, with Jeffrey Wright – who played a tragic role in Julian Schnabel’s 1996 Biopic – Joining Dane Dehaan, Kathry Newton and others. The story of the film for the first time BASQUIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAT will be told by the Black director, with Anah saying that “the complexity and richness of his experience as an artist and a child of the African Diaspora until it has to be properly drunk.”
To understand what is at stake for diaz and the history of art in the city, you need to understand that it was not actually real – but the truth. And at this point, Diaz is not equal. “There is a real misunderstanding of what Samo was,” he said. Overshimfied – The one repeated in countless articles and articles – that SAMO stands for ‘same old shit.’


Here’s the real origin story, as Diaz tells you: In 1977, Basquiat and Diaz started going to a friend’s place in Tribeca to smoke weed with their parents. After a while, this became commonplace, and the duo referred to it as “doing Samo,” for “the same old shit.” The phrase became part of the nature of the local youth. The Conceptual Leap came in January 1978, after Basquiat wrote a short story for the high school magazine he founded, Blues under the press that sells religions, about his brother who sells religions at a Kiosk. The sale at this Kiosk was a “no guilt do whatever you want now, pay later” Religion called Samo.
Diaz, who had been an established graffiti writer since 1971 under the tag-1 bomb, proposed to start a graffiti campaign around SAMO. They began to write slogans on public walls:
“Samo as an alternative 2 God” … “Samo 4 so-called avant-garde” … “Samo as an end 2 Mind-washing religion, philosophies that are nowhere.”
“We were writing in the streets all the time, and our messages were getting more and more sophisticated and philosophical,” Diaz said. They spread the gospel of Samo throughout Tribeca, Soho, the West Village, Chinatown and the East Village. In December 1978, when Village Vaice published an exposé revealing the artists behind SAMO (paying $50 each for creativity. Diaz said he heard the joke continued, but Basquiait wanted to use 15 minutes of fame to promote his art. He did, and soon, Basquiaiall was a line of art.
Which brings us back Samo is alive. Diaz reached out to Onah and the two met at a lower Manhattan diner to discuss the project. He also met with Harrison and Ramirez, but talks ended when Diaz was asked to be paid as a consultant on the film. “They never responded to me with a consultation. I didn’t get any feedback. And then the next thing I know,” she said.
Gaz insists his frustration is not about money, although the economy is undoubtedly about it. Really accurate. It’s about who controls the narrative when that narrative is fundamentally about the partnership that resides in a single survivor.
If the film director celebrates the true origin of Requaiat, it would seem that there are hinges on the accurate portrayal of the history of Samo. And samo can’t be properly portrayed without diaz. “If they were doing something historically appropriate, they would have wanted someone to guide them in the right direction,” he argued. When Diaz went to his copyright office to see if he could block film use of Samo’s name, he learned that he could not block its use in film only for commercial productions. “I have some copyright rights, but obviously not when it comes to film.”
And the title itself is misleading, Diaz argues. “If they call it Samo is alivethat means something completely different than Jean-Michel Basquaiat’s work after Samo, right? It feels like it’s focused on another aspect of what he’s doing. And that was something he and I did together. ” He added that he blames the filmmakers “who have just been caught in that Word. It’s a great thing… It just feels like they don’t really know what the history of this thing is. “
Julian Schnabel’s 1996 film The ankle Composite characters are used – amalgamations of real people suppressed in fictional places. Benicio del Toro revealed Basquiat’s best friend, a character like Diaz, but there is no real sign of Samo’s collaboration. Diaz called that film “a great work of fiction.” Samo is alive it may be heading in the same direction. “It’s a Hollywood product, so it’s going to add some bullshit to it to make the story possible, whatever Hollywood needs. I don’t have high expectations.”
What does a historically correct basquiait film look like? “The fact that there is already a biopic that work of fiction is enough,” Diaz argues. “You can’t watch it again. The answer to that film would be to do something that is historically correct.”
But there’s a deeper problem at play: Basquiat’s tendency to airbrush interactions outside of the image, simplifying Downtown’s complex web of interrelationships. At the same time, Diaz has an explanation for why he and BaseQuiar parted ways: “Jean-Michel was not your friend, where you have to depend on your friends. That was his way of his friend.”
Another persistent theory is that Basquiait was a graffiti artist. “That’s right, you’re wrongly organized as a graffiti artist … Samo was useless. We were making a social impression. We wanted to write for anyone to read, not only for other graffiti writers.” Culturally, graffiti is “an unwanted subculture. This is not your mother. This is for your friends. In Samo, we could do nothing with the graffiti subculture.”
After the village voice article revealed its identity, basquiait “ran with it. He was like, ‘I’m a boy, I’m a boy. “That’s what made him, but he may have found other ways to build his career. He was smart and very good at promoting himself.”
Samo is alive It remains in post-production for the announced release date, and Diaz continues to make art on his own terms. A solo exhibition has just closed at the same art gallery on Warren Street, featuring new photographs and new paintings. It’s the kind of tough, merciless work that doesn’t befit Hollywood’s narrative of burning genius light and fast.
Perhaps the true legacy of Samo is not as a stepping stone to praise, but as a moment of creative collaboration that challenges the discovery of avant-garde material. As diaz writes in the original samo leaflets: “Samo as End 2 Mass produced humanity.”
The irony, of course, is that Hollywood now produces samo’s on a large scale – turning the punk rock clitique of the art world into a selling biopic subject without the inclusion of the man who created it. “Samo was about hype. About building a brand out of thin air and promoting it a lot. And it was very successful. I think it’s no surprise that now it’s been consumed by Hollywood Hype,” said Dioz. Forty-seven years when the partnership finally destroyed the streets of lower Manhattan, Samo has a life of its own – not one Jean-Michel Basquiaiat for the first time when he and 17, Jean-Michel Basquiaiat first managed to breed cans.
More for artists



