What’s next for Vision Pro? Apple should take a cue from xreal smart glasses

Forget Samsung’s 1,800 Galaxy XR, an Android XR device I was surprised to see the XREAL AURA project, the evolution of the company’s existing glasses. Instead of being an expensive and bulky headset like the Galaxy XR and Apple Vision Pro, XReal’s devices are like oversized glasses that include a virtual display atop a lens. I honestly like XReal’s $649 One Pro for its comfort, screen size and relative affordability.

Now that I’m testing the Vision Pro-equipped M5 (full review coming soon!), it’s clearer than ever that Apple must replicate Xreal’s winning form. It will be a long time before we ever see such a small device as an idea like $1,000, but apple easily created a similar set of comfortable smart glasses that many people can actually afford. And if they work like Xreal glasses, they’ll be more useful than something like meta’s $800 ray display

While we don’t have pricing information for Project Aura yet, given XREAL’s history of delivering devices between $200 and $649, I’d bet they’ll come in cheaper than the Galaxy XR. XREAL’s existing hardware is more sophisticated than the Vision Pro and Galaxy XR, with smaller displays, a limited field of view and no built-in battery. Project aura is a little different with its tatheded computing puck, which will be used to power Android XR and hold the battery. That alone would drive its price up to $1,000 — but hey, that’s better than $1,800.

During my time with the M5 Vision Pro, I couldn’t help but wonder how Apple could bring Visions to its XREAL-like hardware, which I’ll call “the wind” in this sense of thought. The Basic Sunglasses Design is simple enough to reproduce, and I saw apple leaning on simple and more premium materials to make wearing a much nicer atmosphere than the xreal devices. It can undoubtedly be lighter than the 1.6-pound Vision Pro, and since you can still see the real world, you also avoid the feeling of being trapped in a dark VR headset.

To power the spirit of the idea, Apple could recycle the Persion Pro’s battery pack and turn it into a computing puck similar to Project Aura’s. It wouldn’t need the full power of the m5 chip, it would just be smart enough to entertain windows, map objects in 3D space and run very Goiness applications. Vision vision and did not need cameras full of cameras and sensors from Vision Pro, follow your fingers and eyes adequately.

I can also see the apple matching, or even surpassing, the 70-degree field of view project, which is already a big brush beyond the XReal One Fov’s 57-degree FOV. Previous XReal devices were severely limited by a small FOV, which meant you could only see virtual screens with socks. . Compressing a higher FOV is much more.

In my review of the Original Vision Pro, I wrote, “If Apple would just sell a headset that allows your Mac screen for well over $1,000, I think creative users would be all over it.” That would be an attainable goal for the spirit of vision, especially if it doesn’t rush to fully immerse the XR. And even if the Apple tax has pushed the price up to $ 1,500, it will still be more interesting than the Vision Pro’s $ 3,500 cost.

While I don’t have high hopes for Android XR, its mere presence should be enough to push Apple to tone down the Visions and deliver something people can afford. If xreal can design comfortable and functional smart glasses for a fraction of the cost of the Vision Pro’s, why can’t apple?