In history For gluteal development, Mexico City stands out. It they protrude. It was here, in 1979, that the plastic surgeon, Mario González-Ulloa, first implanted silicone implants made specifically for the buttocks. Book of Letters Body bankruptcy with silicone implants González-Ulloa calls the “Grandfather of Buttock Augmentation.” The first 2000s saw a new generation of Mexico City Butock Change boxers, especially Ramó Cuenca-Guerra. In his 2004 paper “What makes buttocks beautiful?” Cuenca-Guerra posited four factors that determine “attractive buttons” and five types of “vulnerability,” with strategies to repair each. I, for example, have DEVECT 5, “Senile Buttock.” .
While understanding the importance of standard procedures and setting guidelines for surgical practice, I was drawn to the Cuenca-Guerra method. And how were decisions made? Like this: 1,320 photos of “1,320 women aged 20 to 35, as seen from behind a panel” are presented “showing what attractiveness is under consideration.” Oh!
I thought it would be interesting to talk to Cuenca-Guerra about the concept of the visible female figure. As something that can or should be further created (or, in the case of senile hettock, remade). As something that exists. I sent an email using the address on a recent magazine cover. There was no answer. Ramón Cuenca-Guerra’s Burtocks are in worse shape than mine. He’s been dead for a while. I was able to reach my partner, José Luis Daza-Flores. Here is the third generation; Just as Cuenca-Guerra had studied under González-Ulloa, Daza-Flores had studied under Cuenca-Guerra, passing on the list of races and making dazas of additions, “
Daza-Flores collaborated with Cuenca-Guerra on a paper called “CHODF implants,” where the team did for the lower leg what the butt did: Here again, plastic surgeons were also hired to judge the images – 2,600 of them, a large set of images of women’s legs.
The paper took an unexpected turn. Referring to the image placed on the lower leg which is considered attractive, the authors tried to show that its proportions are in harmony with that divided by the lower part divided by the long part divided by the long part, both of those ratios will be 1.6 to 1. I found an illustration of the upper part on a website called Math that is interesting (and convincing to no one). The golden dividing line splits lengthwise with one chunk about a second and the other around a third. The ancient Greeks divided the “ideal” face into three equally spaced parts. This was the first time I had seen the upper part work on the leg.
This paper had sentences like: “Seventeen women had small legs, in the shape of a tube, and a ratio of 1: 1.618 in AP and LL projections.” Although I admit to not seeing the details of the discussion, I believe it to be an accurate description of the statistics of the cakes.
