Elon Musk’s answer to Wikipedia is now here. On Monday, musk announced That his own encyclopedia, the Grokipedia, now resided.
According to Musk, the current version of Grokipedia is only version “version 01.1” but he said that it is already “better than wikipedia.”
This tweet is currently unavailable. It can be loaded or unloaded.
Until a few years ago, Elon Musk Links shared often In the Wikipedia entry for X, then known as Twitter. However, since he made the transition to political correctness, musk has become a big critic of wikipedia, – want It has a leftist bias. You just started referring to the site as “Wikipedia“And make calls to”money book“Or stop donating to Wikimedia, the non-profit that runs the platform.
However, considering he is better than wikipedia, musk’s Grokipedia seems to be ripping off a significant amount of content from it.
For example, as Veil Note, the Grokipedia entry for the Sony Video Game PlayStation 5 is a complete Wikipedia copy of the Wikipedia entry for the PlayStation 5. Even the selected external sources are the same, although it appears that Grokipedia has changed the order of how they are listed.
Left:
Credit: Wikipedia
Right:
Credit: Grokipedia / Wikipedia
Grokipedia has added one thing to its playstation 5 entry that is not found in the wikipedia version. A disclaimer at the bottom of the page, admitting to “re-edited” content from Wikipedia.
“Content adapted from Wikipedia, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 license” “it reads. Because the content of Wikipedia is published under the Creative Commons Spreen license, Grokipedia can publish its content under certain conditions.
Bright light speed
The problem of copying appears to be widespread. We used the Plagiarism Detection Service Copyscape to look at the Grokipedia entry for Titanic, and Copyscape found that 18 percent of the page, or about 3,600 words, were copied from Wikipedia. At the top of Grokipedia’s entry, there is this notice: “TRUTH-REQUESTED BROK Yesterday.”
Left:
Credit: Wikipedia
Right:
Credit: Grokipedia / Wikipedia
That suggests that Grokipedia is intended more as a fact-checking tool than an actual wikipedia alternative.
Unlike Wikipedia, which has dedicated human editors who contribute to the site, MUSK’s Grok AI oversees the content posted on Grokipedia. And it seems that in most cases, Grok simply uploads Wikipedia entries to its own corruption and pastes its content on its own Grokipedia site.
Social media users continue to find many grokipedia entries lifted directly from the corresponding Wikipedia entry, which is often unchanged.
Grokipedia entry for Composer Franz Liszt? We stopped from wikipedia. Grokipedia entry for the Miller effect? – I fed you Sentence from wikipedia text. Grokipedia page for PC-98? Done from wikipedia.
Another wikipedia contributor found theirs presentation The entry was copied line by line and published on Grokipedia.
This tweet is currently unavailable. It can be loaded or unloaded.
So, how does Grokipedia differ from the supposed updated Wikipedia?
Some politically charged articles on Grokipedia appear to have been rewritten for rewrites to add to their diminished power, but much of Muskipedia Alternative appears to be Wikipedia itself.
