From Amazon to Lockheed Martin, these companies are helping to build Trump’s White House Ballroom
Democrats promised to investigate how President Donald Trump and his impeachment proceeded with the rapid demolition of the white house, as Americans posted “rip East Wing 1902-2025” on social media platforms.
The East Wing actually went into full swing on Thursday, after construction began three days earlier.
The wing, first built more than a few years ago during the administration of President Teddy Roosevelt, has served as a foundation for the President’s Spouse, and it is where visitors enter for public visits or to attend events such as public meals or to attend events such as public meals or to attend events such as public meals or to attend events such as public meals.
Meanwhile, the White House released a list of donors on Thursday who are donating money to the construction of a balltoral future in that area, a project that the errant administration will not come at the expense of taxpayers. But critics of the White House say that asking for money from the private sector creates problems for him.
“This is part of what Donald Trump has been doing since Day 1 of his Presidency, using the largest payment scheme in the history of the country, and perhaps soliciting donations from It’s from people who have business before the United States government,” said Democratic House leader HAkeem Jeffries this week, in an interview with MSNBC.
Jeffries promised Democrats would seek accountability and investigate what led to the collapse, but was limited in what he could achieve in the Republican-led House, at least until next year’s elections.
Tech Giants List of contributors
While the donation amounts are not known at this time, the White House released a list of donors on Thursday that includes giants Amazon, Apple, Meta and Alphabet, as well as longtime Trump supporters.
According to a CBS news report, donors have the option to make a lump sum or spread their donations over three areas in 2027.
“Lockheed Martin is grateful for the opportunity to help bring the President’s vision to life and make this happen in the people’s homes, a powerful symbol of the American people’s intentions that we work to protect every day.
Refrigeration and Heating Corporation Carriers said earlier this week it was “honored to provide the new Iconic Ballroom at the White House with the White-Class System.”
The donations come amid Trump’s second presidency in which his administration has pressed law firms, media companies and colleges and universities for concessions, apologizing for favored policy items. The administration also took a stake in more than one company, in a departure from traditional Republican orthodoxy.
It’s unclear how much the company currently has with the federal government, but Syracuse.com reported that Microconductor Technology, one of the semiconductor’s biggest contributors, was already set to receive a new tax break in Upstate York.
Dynamic claims and calculations
This page 900,000 Ballroom-Foot Ball it would be a very big change for the high-rise building of the mansion – which could be a part the size of The proposed ballroom – about 80 years.
While talking about the ballroom project in July, both Trump and White House press secretary Karoline Leavett said it would not need to be revealed.
In addition, the price tag has increased in various statements by Trump in recent months, from $ 200 million US to $ 250 million to $ 250 million to $ 300 million, since the ballroom has appeared in the area of nearly 1,000 now.
Trump has been reaching out in hopes of putting his money on the line.
“I can’t tell you until I’m done, but I’ll give whatever it takes,” he said Thursday.
How does this project look different?
The renovation of the East Wing during the Harry Truman administration appears to be the most expensive to date, equivalent to $60 million in today’s dollars. But more work was needed, the White House historian said, because engineers found The White House was “in danger of falling.”
Almost every President since is not familiar with the limited repair of the limited renewal in the external or internal work, due to the need or thought of Ronald Reagan clearly removing the time of the solar panels on the roof installed during Jimmy Carter’s.
Trump isn’t the first to call on private equity to raise money and avoid spending tax money — Gerald Ford did it for an outdoor pool, and the Obamas did it for restructuring purposes.
Democratic Sen. Richard Bluncenhal took issue with Republicans who compared the ballroom to the newly reformed polls.
“[Past presidents] it’s full in the lake. They might take over the bowling alley. They didn’t destroy every wing of the white house irreparably,” he said.
House Democrats on Thursday wrote to the White House demanding answers to several questions and citing “a strong historical example of Congress providing funding for General Hatekeep and maintenance of the White House.” They also asked why the administration had not officially launched public consultations, including the two commissions that signed the previous reforms, the Commission of Thousands of Land and the Commission of Fine Arts.
SCHRF, the Chairman of the National Planning Commission, said in September that the organization is alive and does not have the power to demolish or prepare the site for disaster buildings.
“What we’re using in construction is basically vertical construction,” said Scharf, also the White House Labor Secretary.
Bryan Green, who served as NCPC Commissioner under Democratic President Joe Beriden, questioned that explanation.
“Retrenchments will not actually be separated from the next new construction,” Green told Reuters. “This is linked.”
Green and others also point out that the first Trump administration followed the proper consultation process with the two Commissions above when adding the Tennis Pavilion.
It appears to be another case where the Trump Bedrivation administration has taken non-Ironclad traditions and ignored them.
Sarah Bronin, a law professor at George Washington University and also an architect, told Reorge that while the layoffs are ‘innumerable’ acts of solidarity, it adds that “It is very clear that the congress did not write strict enough rules to limit the possible activities like this. “
Despite the obvious differences with the past and present charge Prices, Leavitt said Thursday that “WAny construction project, there are changes over time as you evaluate how the project will look, “while emphasizing that”the president has been the obvious. “
But the White House offered little detail on how the layoffs affected them The President’s Emergency Center is an emergency, major crisis center that can be used in emergencies, located under the east wing.
Little pushback from Republicans
House Speaker Mike Johnson said Thursday “ The ballroom will shine. “
“By the way, hey Democrats, if you win the White House back, you get to use it, too,” he added.
Johnson and Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin insisted that the project was paid for with private money, with Mullin also relying on Trump’s work as a real estate baron.
US President Donald Trump is now planning to demolish the entire East Wing of the White House after previously saying that the current building will not be ‘re-interfered with’ during a US$ 300 million US renovation. Management sources say the demolition will be completed by the weekend.
“I mean, yYou have found a builder who has an eye for design and beauty. What better person to want to renovate the white house? Mullin said.
Republican Senators Thom Tillis and Lisa Murkowski expressed concern this week about Optics. The government has been closed for more than three weeks – Most polls suggest that Americans blame the Republicans more than the Democrats for the Develosment for the Implasse – next week, millions of low-income Americans could lose access to food aid targets.
“We are talking about building a ballroom when we are trying to find a broken economy. Bad timing,” said Sen. Tillis.
Responding to the public
In DC, tourists have trotted out to catch glimpses of bulldozers and debris.
“It’s his house … He’s spending his money not my tax money. That’s fine with me.” “And like any old house, things need updating.”
Jonathan Fineberg, a 79-year-old from Philadelphia, offered a different take on Thursday while speaking to Reuters.
“This country is full of homeless people with nothing, and this moron spends this kind of money on this?”
