Social media bullies who don’t comply with child account bans: Australia’s watchdog – National
Australia’s internet safety watchdog said on Tuesday it was considering legal action against Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube, alleging they are not doing enough to keep Australian children under 16 off their platforms.
Experts say Australian courts can decide what steps platforms can reasonably be expected to take under the rules that came into force on Dec. 10 which prevents minors from holding accounts.
Julie Inman Grant, Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, on Tuesday released her first compliance report since the rules came into effect requiring 10 platforms to remove all Australian account holders under the age of 16. Although five million Australian accounts have been closed, a large number of Australian children have continued to maintain accounts, create new accounts and pass schemes, the report says.
Inman Grant said in a statement that his office has “serious concerns about the compliance” of half of those 10 platforms. His office was collecting evidence against the five that they did not take “reasonable steps” to prevent minors from holding the accounts.
Courts can issue fines of up to 49.5 million Australian dollars ($33 million) for the system’s failure to comply. eSafety will decide whether to initiate court proceedings in either forum by the middle of the year.
Get the latest country news
Get the best Canadian news delivered to your inbox as it happens so you never miss a trending story.
Age-restricted platforms that can be investigated are Reddit, X, Kick, Threads and Twitch.
Communications Minister Anika Wells said the five criticized platforms were deliberately not in compliance with Australian law.
“Social media is choosing to do very little because they want these laws to fail,” Wells told reporters.
“This is the best law in the world. We are the first in the world to implement it. Of course they don’t want these laws to work because they want it to have a negative impact on the twelve countries that came out from December 10 to follow Australia’s initiative,” he added.
eSafety identified “bad practices” such as platforms that allow unlimited attempts for a user to pass age verification methods and encourage the user to try to pass the age verification method even after revealing that they are underage.
Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, told the Associated Press it was committed to complying with the social media ban in Australia. “We are also clear that accurately determining age online is a challenge across the industry,” the statement said.
Snap Inc., Snapchat’s parent company, said it has locked 450,000 accounts in compliance with the law and continues to lock more every day.
“Snapchat remains fully committed to taking appropriate action under the law and supports its core mission of improving online safety for young Australians,” Snap said in a statement.
TikTok declined to comment on Tuesday and Alphabet Inc., which owns YouTube and Google, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Lisa Given, an information science expert at RMIT University in Melbourne, said she expected the courts to decide whether the platforms had taken “reasonable steps” to exclude minors.
“If a tech company says: look, we’re age verification, we’ve done all these steps. That makes sense. Even though the age verification technology is flawed, whose fault is that? Should they be held accountable for a piece of technology that’s not 100% foolproof and probably won’t be 100% foolproof anytime soon?” Nikiwe said.
“That’s really the bottom line: what the courts will see as reasonable,” he added.
Reddit has lodged one of two constitutional challenges to the social media ban in the High Court of Australia. Another was filed by the Digital Freedom Project, a Sydney-based rights group that did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Tuesday.
Both cases said the law was unconstitutional because it violated Australia’s stated freedom of political expression.
A hearing is scheduled for May 21 when the court will set a date for oral arguments, Reddit said Tuesday.
© 2026 The Canadian Press
