World News

US Admiral says there is no ‘kill them all’ for submarine attack aimed at Congress scressiny

The US Navy Admiral told the legislators on Thursday that there is no “kill all” order from Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, but the biggest concern continues to be the attack on the first boat in the boat of other countries near Venezuela.

Admiral Frank “Mitchley” was very clear that he was not given such an order, not to give it to the committee with a quarter, “Sen. Tom Cotton, written in detail, said, was written the order of the Senate Pranch, who came out of it summarized in Washington, DC

Cotton defended this attack, but the democrats were also offended and saw the video of the survivors who were killed who questioned the Trump Administrations and said that the incident was related to this incident.

“What I saw in that room was one of the most disturbing things I’ve seen in my time in public service,” said the Connecticut representative. Jim Him. Jim Him, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee. “You have two people in clear distress with no means of lubrication, and a damaged ship, killed by the United States.”

“The order is basically: To destroy these drugs, kill 11 people on the boat,” said Washington State Rep. Adam Smith, the top Democrat on the House Services Committee. Smith, who wants to continue the investigation, said that the survivors were ‘foreigners without shirts clinging to the bow of a bad and ineffective boat, towing in the water.’

Among those stones were the leaders of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees and the Intelligence Committee in each chamber. Most lawmakers on the floor, including senators, declined to comment as they left.

Joining Admiral Bradley in the Capitol was Gena Dan Caine, who is the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, because our sets were to investigate the obvious revelation in the conduct of the Venezuelan military.

Watch | The Most Important Questions About Any Strike, Says Ex-State Dept.

CBC talks to a former adviser to the US State Department on strikes on suspected drug boats

Get the latest on CBCNews.ca, the CBC News app, and the CBC News Network for breaking news and analysis.

Lawmakers are demanding a full accounting of the strikes after the Washington Post reported last week that on September 2, Bradley ordered an attack on two survivors to comply with Hegseth’s order to ‘kill everyone.’ Legal experts say the attack amounts to a crime when it comes to survivors, and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are calling for accountability.

DROPPED ACTIVITIES AND ACQUISITION OF STORES AS “Enemy Enemies” Without Congressional Authorization have already been questioned by several legal experts. Also, the head of the US Southern Command – which supported operations in the Caribbean Sea – is expected to suddenly resign in mid-October, before the end of his term.

The military authorities knew there were survivors in the water after the first strike but they carried out the next strike under the pretext of needing to sink the ship, according to the story, which was not authorized to discuss it publicly.

Democrats have demanded that the Trump Administration release the full video of the September 2 attack, as well as written records of orders and directives from HEGSTES.

Republicans, who control the national security committees, have not publicly sought those documents but promised a full review.

“The investigation will be done on the numbers,” said Republican Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi, who chairs the House Services Committee. “We will find the truth of the world.”

Two clean men in military uniform are shown.
US Navy Admiral Frank, left, and Gen Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was shown before softening the lawmakers in Washington on Thursday. (Mark Schiefelbein / The Associated Press)

More than 80 people were killed in a series of US military strikes and two survivors who survived the next strike were repatriated.

President Donald Trump stands behind the hegseth as he defends his administration against the attack.

Hegseth said that the results of the first strike on the boat swore that he was ‘incredible’. ‘” He also said he “didn’t stick around” for the second strike but Bradley “made the right call” and had “absolute authority” to do it.

HEGSETH IS GUARANTEED THE LAST FREE Houkho Strike

And on Thursday, the Department of Defense’s investigation department released a report that partially focused on the use of HEGSTE messages of the signal messaging program in March to share sensitive information about Yemen’s Houthitians against the Houthi’s forces. The report found that members of Hegseth had been in danger by doing so on his phone.

In at least two separate signal conversations, Hegseth gave the exact time of the warplane’s launch and when the bombs would drop – before the men and women did that the attack on the United States took its breath away.

Hegseth’s use of the application came when the journalist, Jeffrey Goldberg of the Atlantic, was inappropriately added to the document of advice by the National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, as the high-ranking officials were brought together to discuss the March 15 military against Iran-bases.

Hegseth had created another signal conversation with 13 people including his wife and brother, in which he shared the same details of the same strike, said the associated media.

The signal is encrypted but not authenticated by carrying classified information and is not part of the Pentagon’s secure network.

Hegseth previously said that none of the information shared in the conversations was classified. The current and former military authorities have told information about that permission, especially before the strike happened, it was not appropriate to participate in an unsecured device.

The revelations sparked intense scrutiny, with Democratic lawmakers and a small number of Republicans saying he was sending information to signal negotiations before the military jets arrived and put those pilots in danger. They said that the lower-ranking members of the army would have been fired because of the lack of it.

Watch | Democrat Jim Himes said the military was being put at risk by the conversation:

US Lucky will not be ‘waiting for the dead now,’ said the democratic aid in the dispute to discuss the signs

Connecticut Congloressman Jim Himes says the interview on the Houthi Airstrikes opened to the reporter may have been taken lightly by the US Rivals.

The US launched a wide-scale attack against the houkhes, after the battle group was subjected to a series of missile and drone attacks by ships in late 2023 in what Israel did to eliminate hamas in the Gaza strip. The Houthi campaign has severely reduced the flow of commercial trade through the Red Sea Corridor.

After the disclosure of Hegseth’s signal interview involving an Atlantic editor, the magazine released the entire thread in late March. Hegseth went into a lot of detail about the upcoming strike, using military language and laying out where the “Strike Window” begins, where the time elements of the strike are being used and the various aircraft that will be used in the strike.

A Pentagon spokesman called the inspector general’s report “a complete reflection of Secretary Hegseth,” a claim that was attacked by Democratic lawmakers.

“This was not the only one. It shows a broad pattern of indifference and poor judgment from a secretary who has repeatedly shown that he is in over his head,” said Sen.

The first discovery of the report was reported on Wednesday by CNN.

Read the Full Report:

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button